“I want to be educated on how to push back on the climate alarmism in my generation.”

–Student at Davenport

Students and educators can get a free copy of Fossil Future here:
yaf.org/fossilfuture

“His honest points about human flourishing to master our environment vs human impact on earth have won me over. It has totally changed my mind about fossil fuels and climate change.”

Get Fossil Future: fossilfuture.com

If you're new to my work, follow me Alex Epstein for extreme clarity on energy, environmental, and climate issues from a humanist perspective. Also, subscribe to my newsletter, featuring lots of concise, powerful, well-referenced energy talking points. alexepstein.substack.com

Fossil fuel companies should say two things when threatened for expressing pro-fossil-fuel opinions: 1) We have a 1st Amendment right to our opinions on energy and climate, and 2) We are now going to talk a lot more about the benefits, including climate benefits, of our industry.

For decades, many fossil fuel companies have increasingly expressed opinions that concede climate catastrophism, fail to articulate the unique benefits of fossil fuels, and even endorsed the catastrophic policy of 'net zero by 2050.'

*This* is what they should be criticized for.

Earthjustice You call this a 'win,' but it's a loss for the billions who depend on affordable, reliable energy from coal. Your 'clean energy future' is a bleak one of scarcity and poverty for the world's most vulnerable. Shame on you for celebrating this.

'Epstein is THE voice for America's energy future. He takes a smart approach to the complex issue of energy policy and the need for reliable energy sources in order for humanity to flourish.'

- Rep. August Pfluger

While government attacking fossil fuel companies for their 1st Amendment-protected opinions against rapid GHG restrictions is illegitimate, private citizens should criticize many companies for an opposite reason: their opposition to GHG restrictions has been way too weak.

Why is there not 'disinformation' focus on demonstrably fraudulent 100% renewable claims? Because this fraudulent 'disinformation' is in support of the Congressional catastrophists' agenda of rapidly eliminating GHG emissions.

Here are exposes of some of the dozens of companies that lie about being '100% renewable.'
forbes.com/sites/alexepst…

alexepstein.substack.com/p/exposing-cor…

“EVs may become even less cost-effective in the future due to rising electricity prices and growing shortages as reliable power plants are shut down in favor of unreliable solar and wind—and increasing raw material prices”
energytalkingpoints.com/bidens-ev-mand…

As I and many others have documented, any company that claims to be '100% renewable' in its electricity is lying—usually by paying grids to get credit for others' solar and wind electricity and blaming others for the paying company's gas and coal electricity.

#FossilFuture

“The Cooling World: ‘Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects.’”

- Newsweek 1975

#Catastrophizing

From a student at University of Florida requesting a copy of Fossil Future:

“I have been getting multiple peer reviews on this and I want to learn more”

Students and educators can get a free copy of Fossil Future here:
yaf.org/fossilfuture

“[Fossil Future] makes a compelling case for more Fossil Fuels (Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas) for the survival of the human race amid the Net Zero ultimatum on CO2 emission by 2050.”

– G Shanmugam, Indian Association of Sedimentologists
journal.indiansedimentologists.com/ojs/index.php/…