Exclusive: a Nature investigation reveals the papers that most heavily cite retracted work yet haven’t themselves been withdrawn. go.nature.com/3AGXucZ

We are on the right track with open science! Appreciation and focal points for our work programme have been highlighted by #UNESCO. read the full reflection 👉 unesco.nl/nl/artikel/une…

"[H]ow to stop bad science propagating" (nature.com/articles/d4158…) and "the papers that most heavily cite retracted studies," (nature.com/articles/d4158…) both featuring the RW Database.

“Assessments of research culture should be open about failure.” blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial…

“[H]ow to stop bad science propagating (nature.com/articles/d4158…)” and “the papers that most heavily cite retracted studies, (nature.com/articles/d4158…) ” both featuring the RW Database.

MDPI Elsevier Why is it still possible in 2024 for an author to add 8 new authors to an article without the editor being notified? Why are authors able to add new authors at all?

"Why research integrity matters to all of us." wonkhe.com/blogs/why-rese…

In a recent letter, I suggested that the #OpenAccess #APC's should be stated on the paper, as well as being held in the metadata. If nothing else if would help funding agencies track their investment. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Medical Research Council National Institute for Health and Care Research UK Research and Innovation Economic and Social Research Council buff.ly/4crnGWS

#R3ISEnetwork #SciComm #Metascience Have you heard of paper mills, or firms that churn out fake research papers and often sell authorship on bogus papers for publication? This week’s #R3ReadToday article will help you uncover the myths surrounding them. (1/2)

Read the original article by Frederik Joelving here on Science: science.org/content/articl…

No more hunting for replication studies: crowdsourced database makes them easy to find | Dalmeet Singh Chawla | ਦਲਮੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਚਾਵਲਾ | buff.ly/471YcxI

The latest article from #UKSGInsights , Sabina Alam from Taylor & Francis "Trends in research integrity concerns and the evolving role of the publisher" bit.ly/3TcR0sE

Chain retraction: how to stop bad science propagating through the literature go.nature.com/3XcIB9X

Researchers find evidence of “widespread involvement” of questionable research practices in Denmark. journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…

A recent article discussion provides important context to Commitment 2 of the Agreement: “Base research assessment primarily on qualitative evaluation for which peer review is central, supported by responsible use of quantitative indicators.” Collaboration is key! (1/3)

Duplicate manuscript submission checking tool finds 1% of manuscripts are being submitted simultaneously to more than 1 journal - with ~36000 submissions being screened per month elsevier.com/connect/a-comm…

"MDPI is down 30% (close to 50,000 articles) as compared with the first half of 2023; Frontiers is down 29% compared with the first half of 2023 (which was already down from 2022)." buff.ly/4d1HAYo

🎉 NEW NRIN WEBPAGE 🎉 Have you noticed our new face?💻 nrin.nl💻 We hope you find the new NRIN webpage more informative and easy to navigate. Look at the events sections to know what's coming up soon ➡️NRIN Happy Hour⬅️ ➡️ NRIN Annual Symposium, 25.10.24⬅️

Just started working in the Netherlands? Welcome! We hope you'll find everything you need to know in our Beginner's guide to Dutch Academia. bit.ly/3TfAMPH

Are you considering applying for an Open Science Infrastructure grant? We have now added a frequently asked questions (& answers!) to the call page. Download them from: openscience.nl/en/calls/open-… > Prepare