Is science to be trusted? How environmentally active youths relate to science in social media New reserach article by Karin M Gustafsson journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11… #openaccess

The latest Pᴜʙʟɪᴄ Uɴᴅᴇʀsᴛᴀɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴏғ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 𝑱𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍 book review 👇🏽

Review of Science and the Public, Cambridge University Press Element, in Pᴜʙʟɪᴄ Uɴᴅᴇʀsᴛᴀɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴏғ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 𝑱𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍. Thanks to Thomas Dickens for reviewing! medium.com/scicomm-book-r…

Excited to share a recent addition to thought on #trustinscience in Pᴜʙʟɪᴄ Uɴᴅᴇʀsᴛᴀɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴏғ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 𝑱𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍. We leverage the increased salience of the issues during #COVID to evaluate the influence of a bunch of antecedents of trust in representative data from the US and Britain. doi.org/10.1177/096366…

🔓The climate battle of ideas: Minority discourses in readers' comments to climate change articles in the #Protuguese press 🔗journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11… #OpenAccess #climatechange #scicomm

Can writing style predict audience engagement with science news? Check out the lastest post on the PUS blog by Ifat Zimmerman, Tali Tal, ayelet baram tsabari 🔗sagepus.blogspot.com/2024/06/can-wr… #SciComm

🪴Public perception of new plant breeding techniques and the psychosocial determinants of acceptance: A systematic review 🔗journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11… #OpenAccess #SciComm

Our July 2024 issue is out! Here's what you'll find there. 🔗journals.sagepub.com/toc/PUS/current #scicomm

➡️From our July 2024 issue - Delineating between #scientism and #science enthusiasm 🔗journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11… #SciComm

What have you been reading this year? Our most read articles since January. #scicomms

🚨New paper now out in Pᴜʙʟɪᴄ Uɴᴅᴇʀsᴛᴀɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴏғ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 𝑱𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍 🚨 MOTIVATED SCIENCE RECEPTION is an extremely pervasive phenomenon. But are some people more prone to it than others? WHO IS AT RISK OF BIAS? 1/4 doi.org/10.1177/096366…

🔓Who is at risk of bias? Examining dispositional differences in motivated science reception 🔗journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09… #scicomm #OpenAccess

In his Pᴜʙʟɪᴄ Uɴᴅᴇʀsᴛᴀɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴏғ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 𝑱𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍 review of Insights on Science Journalism (ed. Felicity Mellor), Matthias Kohring sees this journalism beat in a "conflict between an emancipated journalistic perspective and the supposedly preferable demands of the scientific system". medium.com/scicomm-book-r…

Self-serving beliefs about science: Science justifies my weaknesses (but not other people’s) 🔗journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11… #scicomm

Does exposure necessarily lead to misbelief? 🔗journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11… #scicomm

Check out our latest book review ⬇️⬇️

📢 New pub in Pᴜʙʟɪᴄ Uɴᴅᴇʀsᴛᴀɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴏғ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ 𝑱𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍: Not only official ("corporate") accounts communicate on X on behalf of universities, but also institutes, labs, professors or PhDs. However, the various #voices surrounding «plurivocal» universities have hardly been researched. 👉doi.org/10.1177/096366…

📚Right, it's a new month but did you miss these #bookreviews in August? > Insights on science journalism bit.ly/4cMIOq5 > Demons of the Mind. Psychiatry and Cinema in the Long 1960s bit.ly/4e63KcS