Shadow Droid
@shadowdroid616
ID: 1485985257631326209
25-01-2022 14:37:57
16,16K Tweet
370 Followers
630 Following
asylumet David StonesFan Darian T. NAFO 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🐇 House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Let me just set this here before it becomes relevant: “Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not independently transform Meta Platforms into a government actor for First Amendment purposes.” - Atkinson v. Meta
Mike Scheuchzer Natalie Mark R. Levin Democrats threaten to remove §230 if they don't see their unpreferred material removed. Republicans threaten to remove §230 if they don't see their preferred content left alone. Middle ground might be for them to all stay out of it.
john richards Timothy Patrick 🇺🇸 🪖Space Monkey 🇺🇸 David StonesFan John C. Randolph Bridget Phetasy They were able to do so due to TV networks use of the public airwaves. YouTube does not use the public airwaves and is entirely private. Your comparison does not work.
I'm a conservative. Always admired Reagan. I don't like the 'woke progressive left', and supported DeSantis in the primary. I know Harris is a lib and never liked her. But last night made it obvious to me that Harris has more respect for our institutions, our cultural norms and
Rep. James Glendon JP Non-existent "gender ideology" doesn't have our kids walking thru metal detectors every morning. It doesn't have them running active shooter drills from kindergarten thru 12th grade, or frantically texting us in terror every time campus locks down. Imaginary "gender ideology"
me (M.Karen) Dan David StonesFan eeep The article, and your introduction to it, are absolutely wrong. 1A only applies to "state actors." And providing a forum for speech does not turn a private party into a state actor. SCOTUS made this clear in Halleck.
me (M.Karen) Dan David StonesFan eeep Your operating on the false assumption that such sites couldn't remove content without liability prior to the the creation of 230; that 230 is the source of such rights. It's not. As SCOTUS made clear in Moody, 1A is the source, not 230.
me (M.Karen) Shadow Droid Dan David StonesFan eeep Moderation benefits users who don't want to deal with the type of content that is being removed/moderated, whether that is hate speech, nudity, swearing, etc.. That's why 230 use "Good Samaritan" in the title of secion (c). Wyden indicates this below.