Constantin Yves Plessen
@cyplessen
Psychologist & psychometrician by day @ChariteBerlin.
Meta-analyst by night @VUAmsterdam.
#rstats, #OpenScience, meta-analysis, psychometrics
ID: 872174946461593602
http://www.constantinyvesplessen.com 06-06-2017 19:34:46
785 Tweet
584 Followers
700 Following
At Università di Padova we will soon be recruiting for at least one tenure-track position in clinical psychology. These are REAL tenure-track positions of 7 years (reduced in some conditions). At the end, the person is tenured associate professor, after fulfillment of the "abilitazione".
Did you know of this meta-analytic website by Pim Cuijpers et al. featuring hundreds of RCTs? In the video I'll show researchers (part I) and clients (part II) how to run a systematic meta-analysis looking into the effect of CBT on depression in older adults within 1 minute.
So proud that I have received the 2024 APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research from the American Psychological Association. I want to thank everyone who has supported me and my work over the past decades to make this possible American Psychological Association
Today is Nullius In Verba first birthday! Smriti Mehta and I put out 28 podcast episodes from what should motivate scientists to preregistration. Thanks to all of you for listening! We were wondering: What is your favorite episode? And which topic should we discuss next?
Out @TheLancetPsych our paper on assessment of #suicide in trials of psychotherapy for #depression, led by brilliant PhD candidate Clara Miguel & Master student J Cecconi, w/ Mathias Harrer @[email protected] Pim Cuijpers Eirini Karyotaki Claudio Gentili Wouter van Ballegooijen thelancet.com/journals/lanps…
I never thought of using multiverse plots to illustrate the results of simulation studies until I saw Craig Sewall do it in a thread. It's such a good idea! I adapted Craig's code into a simple generic plotting function & will use them in my lectures in future.
Ash Paul David Nunan Robert Howard Gordon Guyatt We're all on bluesky having fun again. Come on. Also though I don’t want to comment on which is the right analysis, surely we can all agree that a meta-analytic estimate that changes significance if a few events are added is not robust? Maybe we do need a trial?