Maybe I’m off on all this. I’ll happily accept that. But I don’t think I am. 5/5

Prosecutors represent the People as their client, but no one more specific than that. They don’t usually have to make that call to a specific client when things go poorly as a jury returns its verdict. 4/5

Prosecutors don’t usually have the budgets or the time for mock jury exercises that private trial lawyers do. So they have less personal experience witnessing how and on what basis juries deliberate and reach verdicts. 3/5

Prosecutors do confront a higher burden of proof. But they also control when and what to charge in any case. That discretion to avoid hard cases to win is unique. 2/5

For some reason there’s lots of chatter about voir dire today. It seems that many prosecutors think differently about juries than most other lawyers. From my experience as a trial judge, prosecutors tend to look more favorably upon our jury system. I have a few theories as to…

It was a pleasure to visit with Mairead McGuinness, European Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and the Capital Markets Union. With MiCA the EU has shown that tough rules to protect consumers, and nurturing innovations in technology, are not mutually…

If only...

Ohio State at the Masters -- he makes the cut AND gets in a visit to Waffle House. How can you not root for this Buckeye?