All right, here it is, The Guide to SB 1047: shorturl.at/rDIPp

NVIDIA gave us an AI pause. They rate limited OpenAI to create a neck-and-neck competition (OpenAI, xAI, Meta, Microsoft, etc.). For NVIDIA, each new competitor is another several billion in revenue. Because of this, we haven't seen a next-generation (>10^26 FLOP) model yet.

ironically, the same leaders opposing state-level AI regulation are inactive at the federal level. this is why CA must take the lead in establishing guardrails for responsible AI. light-touch regulation is crucial, especially in the tech ecosystem that has become the backbone of

Reminder to submit benchmarks like this to mlsafety.org/safebench $250,000 in prizes for the best safety benchmarks

LA Times Editorial Board endorses SB 1047: Why California should lead on AI regulation latimes.com/opinion/story/…

Big new endorsement for our AI Safety bill, SB 1047: Thank you LA Times editorial board for strongly supporting: “This isn’t the first time big tech leaders have publicly professed they welcome regulation on their products, but then lobbied fiercely to block specific proposals.”

in a couple weeks, i built a nuclear fusor in my bedroom – with zero hardware experience the secret? Claude sonnet 3.5 + projects a glimpse into the process below

This is a tough call and will make some people upset, but, all things considered, I think California should probably pass the SB 1047 AI safety bill. For over 20 years, I have been an advocate for AI regulation, just as we regulate any product/technology that is a potential risk

Here's a new op-ed of mine in TIME: "Few places in the world have more to gain from a flourishing AI industry than California. Few also have more to lose if the public’s trust in the industry were suddenly shattered." The piece discusses how the Three Mile Island accident froze

This competition will show which models are easiest and hardest to jailbreak.

Our best AI defenses are becoming increasingly robust to single-turn jailbreaking attacks, but there's much to do for multi-turn attacks. single-turn: adversarial question -> answer multi-turn: back-and-forth conversation

In a landmark moment for AI safety, SB 1047 has passed the Assembly floor with a wide margin of support. We need commonsense safeguards to mitigate against critical AI risk—and SB 1047 is a workable path forward. Gavin Newsom should sign it into law.

We sent this letter to Gavin Newsom this morning. He should sign SB 1047! 🧵

Just realized I never said it here, but obviously I'm in full support of SB-1047. I'll repeat that I say this as someone who 1/ strongly leans libertarian 2/ hates the state and regulation (I left my home country for this specific reason) 3/ dislikes paperwork as much as the