The claim that a bunch of McKinsey associates are so brilliant and clever they could devise a plan for China to dominate the United States is so patently absurd it almost seems like doom marketing

I like my economics Hayekian, my statistics Bayesian, and my quantum mechanics Everettian

I think this is a pretty reasonable steelman of the “AI regulation” case from rohit.

Anyone else out there have pushback or specific points they think are left out or being misrepresented here?

I think rohit would genuinely appreciate the pushback. I, for

Incredible thread (h/t rohit)

What can LLMs never do? | #DataScience news.dataelixir.com/t/t-l-eidlrjk-…

From 'The Future' by rohit. I'm living with this premise in mind and strongly endorse it strangeloopcanon.com/p/the-future

When I left OpenAI a little over a year ago, I signed a non-disparagement agreement, with non-disclosure about the agreement itself, for no other reason than to avoid losing my vested equity. (Thread)

TJ Parker⚡️ There is so much to be done to make healthcare more available, personalized, and *helpful* to people. And we largely don't need deterministic and diagnostically accurate tech to do that.

To borrow from rohit, a fuzzy brain processor is probably not just ok, but better!

considering openai's deal with reddit, we can soon see such quality also in our gpt queries

we can only hope

rohit Difficult to not feel like it is the equivalent of something along the lines of 'CPU with a clock rate of more than 10^7 Hz and 20MiB RAM'.

I give credit to Google for trying out AI search despite screwing up repeatedly. They are in the arena.

Andrej Karpathy rohit Did “Fahrenheit 451” happen in California too?