Disturbing, even for a man of endlessly idiotic effusions. I say again: Criticize Harris all you want, say she's a flip-flopper or leftie radical. Fine. But this is disqualifying, aberrant behavior by a seriously unhinged person. You have to be in denial not to see it.

NPR reports that Arlington staff have “never seen the level of disrespect” that they got from Trump campaign goons. In a campaign photo, Trump showed a headstone from a combat vet who committed suicide. He did not get the family’s permission. Yeah. Read that again. An outrage.

Both outlets are also sitting on a cache of leaked Trump campaign emails, seemingly colluding to bury them.

It is hilarious to hear Dana Bash asking detailed policy questions and follow-ups to Harris when this is virtually never done with Republicans and absolutely would not happen with Trump. I mean, I support journalism and she should do this, the double standard is just interesting.

Day 4!

Nearly every Senate Republican voted against my legislation that would have required insurance to cover IVF.

Demanding that your fellow citizens adhere to the strictest interpretation of the Bible while not requiring any adherence to the Bible from your preferred presidential candidate is one of the clearest ways to express that you see the Bible only as a tool for your own power.

We’re five days after this incident and neither the times nor the post nor anyone else has managed to reveal the two Trump staffers who assaulted this woman? In front of tons of witnesses? In a notoriously leaky campaign? Not taking the story remotely seriously.

I think Chris LaCivita 's strategy of making news on abortion every day is working and they should keep it up.

Headlines from an utterly embarrassing 24 hours for the political press, who remain incapable of effectively covering Trump.

This is POLITICO, all while they sit on a trove of internal Trump documents they refuse to publish.

The decision-making process behind picking the most unpopular VP nominee in 50 years is more newsworthy than literally anything in the Podesta emails Politico devoted an entire vertical to, and yet we have gotten zero explanation for this radical shift in standards

I'm perplexed by why the media outlets that gladly published stories based on the hacked emails of John Podesta and the Hillary campaign have not published any stories based on the hacked emails of the Trump campaign.

In 2016, when Clinton campaign emails were leaked, the press ran with them hot and heavy. But today, the same outlets are sitting on a Trump campaign hack. Why? trib.al/zgJY04y

As someone who spent 15 years reporting from D.C., I get the savvy insider take, "Trump's crazy rants are no longer news." But about 12 million newly eligible voters—young adults and new citizens—deserve detailed reporting about who he is. Sorry if that bores you.

I keep thinking that if you own a major social media platform, actively support a candidate, and rig your algorithm to promote that candidate at the expense of others that you are providing massively valuable in kind services to a presidential campaign in violation of the law.

The ability to say this is a direct result of media outlets refusing to follow up on the alleged video and continuing to grant anonymity to the Trump campaign staff involved stephen fowler

Basically every Republican: “Please buy my new book, ‘Bold and Brave: the Case for Courage in Challenging Times’” Interviewer: “Thanks for that introduction and sitting down with us. Many people are wondering who you support in the election.” BER: “I’d rather not say.”

New York Times: “Trump recounts history of airplane design in post-hearing press conference”

Would love to read a piece on this by a Black writer because what I’m seeing here but not hearing anyone say is a bunch of people who were not used to having a Black boss and responding to that fact…poorly