Marty Makary MD, MPH
@MartyMakary
@JohnsHopkins professor, @theNAMedicine member, @harvardchansph alum, author of 2 NYT bestselling books. Respect independent thinkers. Prefer data over dogma
ID:77486927
http://www.amazon.com/Blind-Spots-Medicine-Wrong-Health/dp/1639735313/ 26-09-2009 14:29:02
8,4K Tweet
239,6K Takipçi
1,3K Takip Edilen
Follow People
3/x Five behaviors are especially harmful. We propose these as the initial hospital #NeverEvents .
This list builds on the work from Noam Levey Emily Gee Melanie Evans Anna Wilde Mathews Tom McGinty Marty Makary MD, MPH Waqas Haque Molly Kinder RIP Medical Debt Elisabeth Rosenthal & many more.
The U.S. FDA is silent on safety signals of covid-19 vaccines.
“It’s disturbing that they have not released any of these data...They shouldn’t be burying the results in protocols as they’ve done. It’s sneaky' Joseph Fraiman
My latest The BMJ feature maryannedemasi.substack.com/p/fda-silent-o…
I used to write for the The New York Times and went on NPR a lot, but after I wrote this popular 2020 piece in the NYT & argued for open schools and to recognize natural imm, they shut me out and exclusively used doctors who locked arms and rallied schools to close nytimes.com/2020/05/14/opi…
Everyone knows the reason White House is skipping VRBAC, but going to ACIP is because VRBAC has more people who will push back on their deranged policies.
In normal times, The New York Times would cover this
If Trump did it, there would be 10 op eds on how he doesn't value institutions
Very concerning there is still no data on Pfizer's bivalent booster efficacy. Great summary of the problem here in Sensible Medicine open.substack.com/pub/sensibleme…
Dear European Society of Cardiology
Please remove the paywall on this abstract. It is deeply consequential for global vaccine policy. Please let people see it for free.
esc365.escardio.org/presentation/2…
RT if you want them to open this up to viewers
Another win for The New York Times covid coverage.
They managed to cover the study without mentioning that a 16% response rate to a survey is so abysmal that no medical journal would publish it under normal circumstances. It would wind up in the trash.
Congrats!
nytimes.com/2022/10/12/hea…